Curriculum intelligence report

What Actually Happened

Session arc

All sessions

Pilot

Rubric

Teaching Health

Recurring signals

Most Common Curriculum Friction

Weekly-style report

Executive Brief

Expanded transcript corpus

M1 Sessions 1–6

These 74 private WEBVTT transcripts are classified by lesson stage using the supplied six-session course map. Low-confidence and overlapping project-stage assignments remain explicitly reviewable.

Classification review

Transcript Assignments

Teacher-time signals

Activity Mix

Operating opportunities

Time-Disposition Queue

Instructor comparison

Friction by Instructor

Operational friction is grouped from the evidence recorded in each instructor's sessions. Instructors are ordered by Operational Flow score, with Hands-On Success shown as supporting context.

Engagement score: 50% Student Engagement, 25% Hands-On Success, 10% Pacing, 10% Recap Quality, and 5% substantive questions per student-hour. Student count is inferred conservatively until attendance data is supplied; low-confidence estimates temper that component toward neutral, while actual attendance overrides inference automatically.

Learning proxy · computability first

Contribution-Quality Slope

Gate pending

CQS measures how each student's conceptual contribution quality changes over a session. It is a learning proxy—not an engagement score—and is only reported with coverage and gate status.

Fleet computability

Can Current Transcripts Support CQS?

Method guardrails

Metric Configuration

Per-transcript gate

Session Computability

1:1 operating economics

Teacher Time Budget

Gate pending

TTB accounts for every second of a 1:1 teacher hour, separating time that survives at 10:1, time that can be reclaimed, and irreducible per-student human attention. It is an operating-model analysis—not a teacher ranking or learning score.

Headline outputs

Time Map & Ratio Ceiling

Intervention roadmap

What To Build First

Spot-check readiness

Session Time-Budget Gate

Teaching moves

Course-Level Opportunities

Lesson grouping

Coaching Review Queue

Course scale readiness

Live Class Operating Model

Run of show

Adaptable Large-Class Format

Course report

Selected-Course Snapshot

Grounded summary

Ask for counts, patterns, weak spots, or sessions to inspect. Answers can link directly to the relevant session details.

How answers work

Grounded In Session Cards

The chatbot reads the LLM-derived fields already shown in this dashboard, then returns counts and links back to matching session cards.

For subjective questions, it should explain the interpretation it used and list the sessions worth inspecting.

All courses · all instructors

Teach More Students in the Same Time

Portfolio view

This view combines every timed transcript, independent of the course selector, to identify where instructor time can be multiplied without treating capacity as a teacher-performance score.

Highest-leverage operating changes

Top Five Scale Moves

Course comparison

Where Capacity Is Available

Instructor coverage

Who Needs Which Support

Implementation guardrails

Scale Without Lowering Engagement per Student

Brief copied